 |
____________________
Neglect The first pictures in our Neglect Dossier are published below. They speak
for themselves. The Council must act and ACT NOW! More pictures will be published shortly. Keep watching this website. If
you have a problem in your home that the Council is neglecting or if you have any photos you would like to appear on
the website get in contact.
Subsidence
Fungal stains
Cracks
indicating subsidence have appeared on the main Maiden Lane block. The mildewed and stained walls of the block near York Way
are a disgrace - they have been like this for years.
Never cleaned Grime
Windows on this stairwell tower have never
been cleaned at all. Grime on the upper section of this wall is a disgrace. It, too, has never been cleaned.
Peeling paint Rust stains
The paint is peeling off this walkway. In winter the residue
makes it mildewed and slimy underfoot. Rust stains make this play area unsightly. They have been like this for years.
Job abandoned Never cleaned
The painting job which followed a car's engine fire was abandoned
half way. The wall near Allensbury Place has never been cleaned in spite of the fact that the EMB bought a high-pressure cleaner
to do jobs like this.
Job unfinished Cracks ignored
The painting of these railings has also been left unfinished.
Cracks in the concrete and stained walls have been left to make the estate unsightly.
Flowers killed Water damage
Spring flowers used to bloom in this planter. However, the council
stupidly covered the area with a tarpaulin - and then with woodchips. The snowdrops, crocuses and daffodils underneath were
thus killed off - to leave this desert. Since then, however, Maiden Lane Community Enterprises have replanted the
area and there should now be a good display for the summer. A crack in this concrete roof has been left for years. As a result
water drips through and further damages the structure.
Concrete tiles Leaking roofs
A bird's eye view reveals the
Council's neglect. The concrete tiles here have been moved and not replaced. They now resemble a rubble field rather than
a roof. Is it any wonder that these roofs leak?
Yet more grime Never used
Grime on this wall at St Paul's
Crescent: has it ever been cleaned? The Old People's Centre at Allensbury Place has never been used for old people
in over fifteen years.
Drug dealing 1 Drug dealing 2
Drug-dealing takes place in these
two locations: 1. the passageway by the railway line on the western side of the estate and 2. the passageway between the small
Maiden Lane block and York Way. The police have been informed but why has the Council not acted? (If you witness
anything suspicious in these locations phone the police on 02074041212)
Matters raised
by All Our Homes on behalf of residents:
All Our Homes has begun to help residents
of the estate who write in to this webpage with their problems. Among the problems raised so far have been:
1. Anti-social behaviour in Elm Friars Walk.
2. The Council allocations policy as it affects relatives of residents already living on the estate.
3. Rat infestation.
4. The allocation of flats to anti-social tenants has been challenged on behalf of the decent residents
in Broadfield Lane.
5. The unco-operative attitude of both the Housing Patrol and the Weekend Noise Service has
been raised with the Council.
6. Drug dealing in Elm Friars walk.
7. Water leaks: Water from an
upstairs flat was allowed to damage this ceiling for over six months.
Water leak Electrical danger
Water even flooded in through the electrical fitting in the
ceiling. This was highly dangerous, of course.
Leaking roof Striplight
In yet another resident's flat, water comes through a leaking
roof whenever it rains. Rainwater ruins this ceiling and even collects inside the electric striplight.
The danger is unimaginable. This has been reported many times to the Council but nothing has been done. _________________________
LEAVE YOUR OWN VIEWS ON OUR BLOG BELOW:
"Absolutely great! Maiden Lane Estate needs an honest voice."
- Jacqui Crimmins, former EMB
Chairwoman.
__________________
"It's about time we fought back. UNITE
AND FIGHT!"
- Hugh McDade, former EMB Chairman.
_________________ "I, along with many other residents of the estate
feel that Camden's refusal to fund the necessary improvements to our homes unless we accept increased density on our plot
is blackmail. Furthermore, the impact of greater numbers has not been given sufficient consideration. We feel that we should
reject any and all plans put to us by Camden for any development - N,S,E or West on our estate. We want to be left alone.
They can look elsewhere. We will keep our community as it is. We like it as it is. We will not allow it to
be destroyed over the ambitions of some housing chiefs who live in the leafier suburbs of London. We will get by as we are
for now.
"There is no rush. We have waited
this long, we will wait till Camden has the money.
"HANDS OFF OUR LAND, CAMDEN! You can have your industrial estate. BUT HANDS OFF
OUR LAND, CAMDEN!"
__________________________
"Why
would you demolish this classic piece of social housing . . . it must not happen . . . I loved it the first time I saw it
fifteen years ago and I love it even more today . . . I would like to live there myself some day." -
Tim Brightmore
___________________
"Best of luck in your
campaign to keep your
community centre
- and stopping
the demolition of 215 homes on your estate."
Philip Lewis - UNISON Co-convenor Culture & Environment Directorate.
_________________
"Keep up the good work! What an outrage!
[by the Lib Dem/Tory Camden administration] £14 million underspend, a wilful refusal last year to put up the Council tax in line with general inflation,
massive cuts in the voluntary sector ... and then this 'sale of the family silver' approach to housing management."
- Cllr Julian
Fulbrook, Chair of Housing. ______________________
"Even the previous Labour Council
baulked at the idea of demolition as an option to regenerate our estate during the last round of PFI privatisation proposals.
This new Con-Dem administration seems to care little for our needs and rights, rather prefering to sell-off, slash & burn
public assets and services. SAY NO, NOW!!!"
Rob McWilliam, former EMB Chairman. _______________
"They can find the money to offer to residents
to move out because they want to bring in the demolition teams. That won't be cheap - and then they'll get the developers
to come in to make a start. Don't think they will stop at just one or two blocks. This land is worth a cool mint,
all they are thinking of is how much money they can make by doing this to us - that way they will wash their
hands of the able-bodied and the few disabled people that live here. Remember, the council sold off the section
of our housing that had been reserved for sick and disabled people. Now they only have a few adapted flats
left. They have the proceeds sitting in the bank earning them even more money. Why can't they use it to fix
our homes and our surroundings? Instead, they want to use it to bribe residents to leave their homes. Remember what happened
to the disabled woman (in the CNJ. See above). The council got her out of her adapted flat saying it badly needed
repairs. She hoped to move back within six months, but instead, when she opened her newspaper, she discovered the council had
sold her home at auction for £715.000. She was then placed in a rathole by council officials and is still waiting for
rehousing. Open your eyes, people, we have rights! Don't believe anything they tell you, work it out for yourselves. The
private developers will pay over the top for this piece of real estate. It's worth a fortune. Allowing them to bring the
bulldozers onto our estate will mean they have won. They themselves wouldn't want to live on a building site but
that's what they are banking on us doing. They are hoping that we'll get fed up once the bulldozers start and concede
to their terms. A great big NO to demolition of our estate!" - Diana McCleary, former EMB Treasurer.
__________________
"You should
not trust any elected or paid council official. All are proven liars. Trust in yourselves alone. Do not fall for the consultation
process, Camden Council will use it to lie to the outside world. Consultations are usually ignored by elected or unelected
officials. Remember, if voting changed anything it would have been abolished a long time ago. My understanding is you have
already had two large and expensive consultations where you voted against PFI - and an ALMO. How many more times do the Camden
Council liars have to be told?"
- Anonymous blog entry.
"Well
done for exposing the truth about how deviously Camden Council operates. "Consultations" are merely tick-box exercises
with little meaning behind them. Be wary of some rotten tenants who parade themselves as 'representatives' - as they
are equally devious and underhanded. Visit the "Corrupt Camden Council Website" to find out more."
- A Camden Resident
_____________________ "I was very interested to see your site. My
Society (The Twentieth Century Society) has forwarded phase I of the Maiden Lane Estate to English Heritage for official
Listing - but at the time did not consider your phase II worthy.
However,
we still see Maiden Lane Estate phase II as a fundamentally successful piece of design - designed whilst the Council were
still world class in their handling of public housing provision (seems a long time ago now). We believe no planning decisions should be made until the Listing has been decided on and the Society oppose the
demolition of phase II. Please keep the Society informed as the campaign
continues."
- Jon Wright, The Twentieth Century Society.
____________________
"All Camden tenents should get together on an arranged day of protest and march
to the Town Hall (ie. civil disobedience) .We should also bombard housing officers' and councillors' email addresses!"
- C. French ____________________
"Good luck with your campaign!"
- Mandy
Grey ____________________
"Well done for exposing Pat Hayden! . . . . . . My own story is on the
'Pat Hayden Files' website. [See above.] Good luck to all of you!"
- John McKenna ____________________
"I don't actually live in Maiden Lane Estate but live nearby and was very concerned when I heard
about the threat to the estate. Is there any news regarding the threat? Is there anything local people can do to fight this
or raise awareness etc?"
- B. Bennett. ___________________
It is with
some concern (and completely by accident) that I came across your website tonight featuring the threat to the Maiden Lane
Estate. I wish this were the only example. In Greenwich and Kidbrooke the Ferrier Estate is being badly redeveloped at the
cost of formerly secure housing and in Hammersmith and Fulham several estates are under threat from the policies of the Tory
leader Stephen Greenhalgh. I link these issues simply to draw your attention to them knowing there is strength in numbers
and in the hope that a cross London common association can be formed to fight such schemes in future.
- Paul
Bird
___________________
"Camden council is an appallingly bad landlord. Housing management is a law unto
itself and gets away with the most appalling abuses against residents - this is not right and it is not acceptable to
the many decent tenants we have in Camden. Tenant participation is a bad joke with no signs of improving. Our landlord
wastes £2-3 MILLION pounds a year on this bad joke. The council says it wants more tenants to 'participate'
but this is a lie - they don't because they are afraid that new tenants will come with new ideas and challenge
the rotten status quo. Crooked tenant 'reps' who have their greedy snouts in the publicly-funded trough do not
help matters."
- Tracy Morgan
___________________
"I
fear for the residents of Maiden Lane - you have appointed Solon as your independent advisors - take a leaf out of our
book - appoint TPAS as soon as you can - they really stick up for tenants' rights!"
- Leroy
Francis
__________________
"Great
site! It's comforting to know that some tenants are taking active measures to fight against the rotten behaviour
of Camden Council officers and our so-called 'democratically elected representatives' - and their dodgy deals. You are not alone! Come visit my site: Camden Council Rotten Landlord." |
- 'Ms
Understood' __________________
"I think the Council should get on with the work
and make it a good place to live - and make it look decent." - Richard Hammond
__________________
| | | | "To us who have been around on this estate for the past 18+ years the THEFT and
fraudulent actions by Camden Council employees and Labour politicians has resulted in what we have today. People new
to this place blame the new Lib Dems who now have political control but the real power in Camden is in the hands
of non-elected council officers who have been there for years and who have robbed the working class of Camden of decent
housing whilst looking after themselves and their cronies. How many of these live on estates like ours?"
- Frank Thomas
___________________ |
Disclaimer:
The campaign itself and the editor of this website are not responsible for the views expressed by correspondents
to this blog nor for views expressed on linked websites.
Design by PP Web Design. July 17, 2009.
MAKE YOUR OWN COMMENT
|